A design for design Part 1

Last week I spent a highly enjoyable afternoon with a client designing a 2 day training session around a very specific process. For many years one of their specialisms has been around “Change”. They have developed a really robust process but now wanted to develop a training programme to roll the process out to their clients. This needed to not just be about the steps in the process but also the behaviours, skills and attributes that come into play during the change process.

We already had a flow chart for the process and traditionally the way people design a session for something like this would be to run through the steps in the process one by one. So the design would look a bit like this:

  1. Whats going on here?
  2. Why is this step important?
  3. What are the skills needed to complete the step?
  4. What behaviours are important during this step?
  5. What barriers can we predict and what solutions can we come up with?

This design is very linear and it can be challenging to keep it interesting by step 4. It can also be a bit tricky to make the learning brain friendly.

So, this is what we did instead:

Firstly we wrote down the learning objectives for the session as a whole. We did this by completing this sentence as many times as we could while staying relevant to the process.

“By the end of this programme the participants will be able to……..”

These were a mix of “they need to understand the steps in the process and the actions behind each step” and “the behaviours and skills needed during each step”. In many cases these were common for several steps.

We were very careful about our language, avoiding phrases like:

By the end of this programme the participants will be able to understand the steps in the process”.

This isn’t measurable so we aimed for things like:

By the end of this programme the participants will be able to list the steps in the process

By the end of this programme the participants will be able to tell you what actions are behind each step

These objectives are based on the thinking described in one of my favourite books: “Preparing Instructional Objectives” by Robert F Mager as well as previous posts on BFT (especially When F1 drivers need driving lessons)

I think this book is a must have if you design training.

To help us ‘see’ how the objectives might fit with the proven process we wrote down each step on the left hand side of a couple of sheets of flip.

Then we went through the process step by step.

Every time a training objective was relevant to a step in the process we wrote a post-it of the objective and added it to the step across the flip.

At the end each step in the process had a line of training objectives that related to it. Needless to say, some training objectives cropped up several times.

By doing this we were able to have complete confidence that the objectives were aligned to the steps in the process.

In Part Two, Paul explains the ways in which the process is like the Olympic Games and explores how this metaphor can help sequence the content and layer the learning.

skiing image by Cedric's pics>
Share this now:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon

Paul and Ally are working on an exciting 6-part (online) course to help your learners fully engage with your training - sign up for the 'early bird' list for advanced notification and more info

If you liked this, you may also like these:

  1. A design for design Part 2 In the final instalment, Paul explains how the subject of the training is like The Olympic Games....
  2. Acoustic guitar and flexible training design Ally shares a remarkable acoustic guitar performance that inspired insights into training design and delivery. Guitarist Andy...
  3. There is no such thing as a difficult delegate Last week, Paul was running a workshop with a new group with a new colleague who was...
  4. A Goal without a Plan is just a Wish A while ago, Ally was inspired by a YouTube video and wrote a post about flexible...
  5. Are your’s firm or fluffy? (Outcomes that is) Over the years Accelerated Learning has, in some quarters developed an unfortunate reputation for being a little...
This entry was posted in Practice and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Posted February 9, 2010 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    When you determined the end results by writing the test questions first, this is probably the easiest way to construct any training. Throw in some interactivity, engaged all senses and leave time for feedback will only help to ensure engaged participants.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Joy Wilson on February 3, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    RT @bftrainer: New blog post: A design for design Part 1 http://bit.ly/cO7tEV

  2. By A design for design Part 2 | Brain Friendly Trainer on February 4, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    [...] Brain Friendly Trainer support for Brain Friendly Learning practitioners Skip to content HomeAbout UsPaul: profile and postsAlly: profile and postsCan We help?Music at Reading BFLGPracticeClickablesReflectionsTheoryContact Us « A design for design Part 1 [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Get blog posts and news by email



    Subscribe by using rss


    Paul & Ally are launching a new product soon
    Pssst... secret launch info


    Follow us on Twitter
    Follow us on twitter



    Listen to our podcasts


  • Browse by topic

  • Latest articles

  • Latest comments

  • Recent Tweets

    Posting tweet...